FreeCalypso > hg > gsm-codec-lib
view amrefr/encode-r.c @ 605:63f774192906
gsmhr_decoder_twts002_in(): set BFI=1 SID=1 for invalid SID
When a received TW-TS-002 RTP payload indicates invalid SID,
which of the 3 possible BFI/SID combinations should we pass to
our internal ETSI-based speech decoder or TFO engine?
Our original code passed BFI=0 SID=1, but upon further reflection,
BFI=1 SID=1 is a better choice. In the corner case where received
invalid SID is fed to a full decoder in homed state, setting BFI=1
allows that decoder to emit zeros on PCM and stay homed, instead of
launching into full decoding.
| author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Thu, 04 Dec 2025 21:01:46 +0000 |
| parents | 0c4e1bc06740 |
| children |
line wrap: on
line source
/* * amrefr-encode-r is a counterpart to gsmefr-encode-r, implementing * "alternative EFR" by way of libtwamr. Unlike standard gsmefr-encode-r, * there is no -d option and no DTX support in this version. */ #include <stdio.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <strings.h> #include "../libgsmefr/gsm_efr.h" #include "../libtwamr/tw_amr.h" #include "../libtest/roberead.h" main(argc, argv) char **argv; { FILE *inf, *binf; struct amr_encoder_state *state; int16_t pcm[160]; struct amr_param_frame amr_frame; uint8_t efr_frame[EFR_RTP_FRAME_LEN]; int rc; if (argc != 3) { fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s input.robe output.gsmx\n", argv[0]); exit(1); } inf = fopen(argv[1], "r"); if (!inf) { perror(argv[1]); exit(1); } binf = fopen(argv[2], "w"); if (!binf) { perror(argv[2]); exit(1); } state = amr_encoder_create(0, 0); if (!state) { perror("amr_encoder_create()"); exit(1); } for (;;) { rc = robe_get_pcm_block(inf, pcm); if (!rc) break; amr_encode_frame(state, MR122, pcm, &amr_frame); amr_dhf_subst_efr2(&amr_frame, pcm); EFR_params2frame(amr_frame.param, efr_frame); fwrite(efr_frame, 1, sizeof efr_frame, binf); } fclose(binf); exit(0); }
