FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-reveng
comparison pirelli/calypso @ 10:b0f7481efc8b
Pirelli PCB rev eng: finally have something worthy to report:
traced out the 3 chip selects for the RAM/flash MCP.
| author | Michael Spacefalcon <msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG> |
|---|---|
| date | Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:56:45 +0000 |
| parents | |
| children | 8e4dac492552 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 9:7a84f9e42a84 | 10:b0f7481efc8b |
|---|---|
| 1 Calypso pin I thought was nIBOOT (N1), but actually seems to be A13 (RFEN): | |
| 2 the trace from the ball goes straight down to a via, L1 image coords | |
| 3 (3676,1174). On L2 trace goes to another via at (3234,1074). On L5 it goes | |
| 4 to yet another via at (2950,535). On L4 it goes to (1941,457). On L2 it goes | |
| 5 to a surface via at (1957,484). Back on L1 it goes to Rita pin 2 (XEN). | |
| 6 This arrangement matches what the Rita spec describes as the "external VCTCXO" | |
| 7 configuration. In contrast, the Leonardo schematics depict the "internal | |
| 8 VCTCXO" configuration. | |
| 9 | |
| 10 Double-checking: in the "external VCTCXO" configuration Rita pin 1 (XSEL) is | |
| 11 supposed to be grounded. On L1 the pad appears to go nowhere (isolated). | |
| 12 The central coordinates of the pad on L1 are (1956,638). On L2 there is | |
| 13 solid copper fill in that area. Perhaps there is an invisible micro-via? | |
| 14 | |
| 15 The real nIBOOT pin (N1): stays on L1, a trace takes it to one pad of a | |
| 16 2-pad SMT component, the other pad's connection is unclear (appears isolated, | |
| 17 must be an invisible micro-via). Must be a pull-up/down resistor, hopefully | |
| 18 pull-down. | |
| 19 | |
| 20 nCS0 (C2): L1 trace to (4262,1016). On L2 it goes to two via points: | |
| 21 (4852,1016), an obvious larger via, and (4802,1000), a spot where a micro-via | |
| 22 back to L1 could hide. The micro-via back to L1 appears to be there indeed, | |
| 23 feeding an unmasked test point on the surface. Back to the main trace at | |
| 24 (4852,1016): there's something on L4 (might be a trace to another nearby via), | |
| 25 but maybe it's nothing, just a poor picture. Most likely nothing there, as | |
| 26 the same arrangement appears on L5 and L6, but clearly with no connection | |
| 27 between the two nearby vias. L7 is probably where the interesting connection | |
| 28 is, but the trace appears to have been scraped off in that spot in steve-m's | |
| 29 layer-grinding process. | |
| 30 | |
| 31 Taking a different approach: let's start with the RAM/flash MCP on L8. Flash | |
| 32 CE1# goes to (4911,987); flash CE2# goes to (4954,660) and to an L8 test pad; | |
| 33 OE# goes to (4885,982); RAM CE1# goes to (4860,978). Of the two L2-L7 vias, | |
| 34 the upper one appears to be RAM, and the lower one appears to be flash. | |
| 35 | |
| 36 Mistake found: I had earlier messed up trying to trace nCS0 on L2. Now it's | |
| 37 all clear: nCS0 goes to flash CE1#. | |
| 38 | |
| 39 Now let's trace the RAM CS. From the upper L2-L7 via it goes on L2 to | |
| 40 (4800,1002) - already known to be a test point - and to (4212,978). | |
| 41 On L1 it goes to Calypso pin C3 - nCS1, just like on Leonardo. | |
| 42 | |
| 43 Now let's trace flash CE2#. L7-L8 via at (4954,660); L2-L7 via at (4965,927); | |
| 44 on L2 it goes to (4210,930), on L1 it goes to Calypso ball D3. | |
| 45 That's nCS3. |
