FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-docs
comparison Firmware-deblobbing @ 19:f68ca40fa5c1
Firmware-deblobbing document written
| author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:28:00 +0000 |
| parents | |
| children | 14b8e532c966 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 18:7ba5c951803c | 19:f68ca40fa5c1 |
|---|---|
| 1 The state of blobs vs. blob-free firmware in FreeCalypso | |
| 2 ======================================================== | |
| 3 | |
| 4 As of 2019, we have 3 different firmware versions for Standard Modem | |
| 5 functionality: | |
| 6 | |
| 7 * Magnetite hybrid is the current production firmware version. The only blobs | |
| 8 are Nucleus, OSL and OSX glue components of GPF, and TI's proprietary TMS470 | |
| 9 compiler. Everything other than Nucleus and OSL/OSX is compiled from source, | |
| 10 but the compiler is TI's proprietary TMS470. The same Magnetite source tree | |
| 11 also supports other configurations (maintained only for regression testing) | |
| 12 which have more blobs, as well as handset configurations which are currently | |
| 13 frozen for lack of suitable development hardware. | |
| 14 | |
| 15 * Selenite-470 is FC Selenite built with TI's TMS470 compiler: all code is | |
| 16 compiled from source, no blobs other than the compiler and its RTS library | |
| 17 (libc/libgcc equivalent). The blob version of Nucleus is replaced with a | |
| 18 different (slightly newer) version in full source form, while the blob | |
| 19 versions of OSL and OSX glue components have been replaced with reconstructed | |
| 20 sources, i.e., a reconstruction based on disassembly. This fw version is | |
| 21 currently considered experimental, not cleared for production, and the reason | |
| 22 is OSL/OSX: the reconstruction is of uncertain correctness and known to be | |
| 23 incomplete. | |
| 24 | |
| 25 * Selenite-gcc is FC Selenite built with gcc. This version has no blobs | |
| 26 whatsoever (there is no support in the gcc+binutils toolchain for TI's TMS470 | |
| 27 ABI, thus it is physically impossible to include any of TI's COFF blobs in | |
| 28 the link), and it is built with a FLOSS compiler. However, it is even more | |
| 29 experimental and not-for-production than Selenite-470: not only is the OSL/OSX | |
| 30 issue still there, but there is also widespread breakage from the use of a | |
| 31 different compiler which was never anticipated by the original developers. | |
| 32 The old FC Citrine firmware (unmaintained since 2016) also suffers from all | |
| 33 of the same problems, plus additional ones, and therefore should not be | |
| 34 considered at all. | |
| 35 | |
| 36 When it comes to the firmware, right now those OSL and OSX glue components of | |
| 37 GPF form the biggest bone in our collective throat. Just 10 C source files are | |
| 38 missing: | |
| 39 | |
| 40 os_com.c | |
| 41 os_drv.c | |
| 42 os_evt.c | |
| 43 os_isr.c | |
| 44 os_mem.c | |
| 45 os_mis.c | |
| 46 os_pro.c | |
| 47 os_sem.c | |
| 48 os_tim.c | |
| 49 osx.c | |
| 50 | |
| 51 If we can ever find these 10 missing files (does not even need to be exactly | |
| 52 the same version as in TCS211 GPF), then Selenite-470 would immediately become | |
| 53 the new production firmware replacing Magnetite (the Nucleus change isn't the | |
| 54 problem, it's OSL and OSX), and the way would be cleared to begin work on | |
| 55 bringing Selenite-gcc up to par. But in the absence of these 10 files, the | |
| 56 following two interlocking problems get in the way of FC Selenite: | |
| 57 | |
| 58 1) I (Mother Mychaela) am not willing to skip Selenite-470 and jump directly to | |
| 59 Selenite-gcc, as doing so would violate the fundamental principle of | |
| 60 incrementality: we need to be making one small change at a time, requiring | |
| 61 full stability after each incremental change before going to the next. | |
| 62 | |
| 63 2) I am not able to produce a reconstructed C source for certain parts of OSL | |
| 64 which would result in correct object code when compiled with TMS470: the | |
| 65 issue is potential race conditions in the OSL timer code. The existing COFF | |
| 66 object code avoids the race, I can produce C code for compilation with gcc | |
| 67 which also avoids the race, but I don't know the requisite magic for C code | |
| 68 to be compiled with TMS470. | |
| 69 | |
| 70 At this point you are going to ask - OK, so what do we do if we can't find | |
| 71 those 10 missing files? The Mother's current plan is as follows: if these 10 | |
| 72 files are still missing when we get our handset UI development board built, I | |
| 73 will create a third firmware source tree (not Magnetite, not Selenite, but to | |
| 74 be named after some other mineral) with the following key properties: | |
| 75 | |
| 76 * Just like Selenite, it will be hybrid only, no legacy blob-laden | |
| 77 configurations; | |
| 78 | |
| 79 * Both modem and handset configurations will be included; | |
| 80 | |
| 81 * The compiler will be TMS470 - sorry, no gcc; | |
| 82 | |
| 83 * The version of Nucleus will be the new source-enabled one, same as Selenite; | |
| 84 | |
| 85 * I will do some careful surgery on the OSL/OSX blobs to make them work with | |
| 86 the new version of Nucleus. | |
| 87 | |
| 88 The result of these listed key properties is that the new firmware tree will | |
| 89 have blobs for OSL and OSX and will use the TMS470 compiler as required by | |
| 90 these blobs, but absolutely everything else will be source-enabled. This | |
| 91 situation will then persist until someone can wave a few million dollars in | |
| 92 front of TI to convince their execs to direct their archivists to dig up the 10 | |
| 93 missing files, or until the world civilization collapses into a Mad Max world, | |
| 94 allowing us to seize those archives with a Spetsnaz unit without police | |
| 95 interference. | |
| 96 | |
| 97 Special modem applications | |
| 98 ========================== | |
| 99 | |
| 100 The above plan states that the third firmware source tree will be created as | |
| 101 described if the original OSL and OSX source files are still missing when we | |
| 102 get our handset UI development board built. The reason for this coupling is | |
| 103 that when we get this UIDB built, the floodgates will open for intensive | |
| 104 handset UI development. The latter work will need to be done without the | |
| 105 clutter of Magnetite, yet Selenite is blocked by the lack of the 10 missing | |
| 106 files - hence the case for the third firmware source tree as described above. | |
| 107 | |
| 108 Alternatively, a third fw source tree similar to the one described (but perhaps | |
| 109 without the handset configuration) can be created if someone commissions | |
| 110 significant work on modem firmware, work that is significant enough to call for | |
| 111 a source tree that is as stable as Magnetite, but free of the clutter. | |
| 112 | |
| 113 cdginc header files | |
| 114 =================== | |
| 115 | |
| 116 Another area of deblobbing that hasn't been done yet, but can be done when and | |
| 117 if a serious need arises, is the cdginc header file set. The cdginc files which | |
| 118 are currently used for our hybrid config aren't blobs in the strict sense: they | |
| 119 are C header files included by the sources being recompiled, but they have been | |
| 120 auto-generated (from true human-editable sources which we do have) by a tool | |
| 121 (ccdgen) which currently exists only as a Windows binary sans source. | |
| 122 | |
| 123 If anyone needs to make changes to cdginc, the proper course of action should | |
| 124 be to hire a Windows reverser to reverse ccdgen.exe and to produce a perfect | |
| 125 form, fit and function replacement. |
