FreeCalypso > hg > fc-selenite
diff src/cs/layer1/tpu_drivers/source0/tpudrv12.h @ 163:a911ac771094
board preprocessor conditionals: prep for more FC hw in the future
Please see the corresponding change in fc-magnetite for the explanation.
| author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Mon, 01 Apr 2019 01:20:03 +0000 |
| parents | df9c471ce9e9 |
| children | 7409b22cac61 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/cs/layer1/tpu_drivers/source0/tpudrv12.h Thu Mar 28 00:36:10 2019 +0000 +++ b/src/cs/layer1/tpu_drivers/source0/tpudrv12.h Mon Apr 01 01:20:03 2019 +0000 @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ #define TU_1900 ( PA_HI_BAND | FEM_PINS ^ FEM_8 ) #define TD_1900 ( PA_OFF | FEM_PINS ^ 0 ) -#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_GTAMODEM) || defined(CONFIG_TARGET_FCDEV3B) +#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_GTAMODEM) // Openmoko's triband configuration is a bastardized version // of TI's quadband one from Leonardo/E-Sample @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ * In our FreeCalypso hw family, we would like to be able to use * both triband and quadband RFFEs. Our current FCDEV3B is triband, * copied from Openmoko, and the same is expected to be the case for - * future low-cost designs, but if someone pays for a new RF layout, + * future low-budget designs, but if someone pays for a new RF layout, * we can use a quadband RFFE instead. If we ever have two different * hw platforms or variants that differ in the RFFE but are otherwise * firmware-compatible, we would like to have the same fw build